Tucker Carlson Interviews Vladimir Putin

  • Date: Feb. 9, 2024
  • Speaker(s):
Average objectivity: 0.06
Average polarity: 0.25

Sentiment guide

Each sentence is analyzed using machine learning algorithm to get a sentiment score. Polarity scores determine how positive or negative sentence is. Objectivity scores determine how objective or subjective each sentence is
Polarity
Negative speech
Positive speech
-1
1
Objectivity
Subjective speech
Objective speech
0
1

Data visualization

Distribution of sentiment scores from sentences
How many times certain sentiment score repeated itself.

Vladimir Putin

Average polarity: 0.04
Polarity
Negative
Positive
-1
1
Objectivity
Subjective
Objective
0
1
Average subjectivity: 0.26
Polarity
Negative
Positive
-1
1
Objectivity
Subjective
Objective
0
1

Most used part of speech

Nouns
  1. who - 62
  2. all - 57
  3. from - 55
  4. would - 49
  5. people - 45
Verbs
  1. think - 67
  2. said - 61
  3. had - 49
  4. say - 37
  5. know - 32
Adjectives
  1. other - 31
  2. right - 20
  3. more - 20
  4. told - 18
  5. such - 16
Adverbs
  1. there - 58
  2. then - 48
  3. very - 43
  4. just - 36
  5. now - 30

Sentences sentiment

Most positive
  1. Maybe he wasn’t the best president and politician.1.0
  2. All those, however, claimed that Ukraine should have a very good relationship with Russia.0.91
  3. I had a very good relationship with say, Bush.0.91
  4. We just realized we weren’t welcome there.0.8
  5. We agree.” I said, 'Thank God, great.0.8
Most negative
  1. I’m not saying this is bad.-0.7
  2. Poland, where Ukrainians were persecuted and treated quite brutally, as well as were subject to cruel behavior.-0.68
  3. In my opinion, it is impossible by definition.-0.67
  4. He says, 'It’s impossible.-0.67
  5. Well, it’s impossible now.-0.67
Most objective
  1. This was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.1.0
  2. But then there was a unification, the union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland.1.0
  3. It’s not boring.1.0
  4. As the Poles had not given the Danzig corridor to Germany, had went so far pushing Hitler to start World War II by attacking them.1.0
  5. By the way, the USSR, I have read some archive documents, behaved very honestly.1.0
Most subjective
  1. Societies are defined by what they will not permit.0.0
  2. Thank you, Mr. President.0.0
  3. Shall we end here, or is there anything else?0.0
  4. The unity is still there.0.0
  5. Now, they will be reunited.0.0

Carlson Tucker

Average polarity: 0.07
Polarity
Negative
Positive
-1
1
Objectivity
Subjective
Objective
0
1
Average subjectivity: 0.24
Polarity
Negative
Positive
-1
1
Objectivity
Subjective
Objective
0
1

Most used part of speech

Nouns
  1. interview - 4
  2. end - 2
  3. watch - 2
  4. technique - 2
  5. war - 2
Verbs
  1. started - 2
  2. filibustering - 2
  3. see - 2
  4. claim - 1
  5. found - 1
Adjectives
  1. most - 2
  2. several - 1
  3. attack - 1
  4. obvious - 1
  5. physical - 1
Adverbs
  1. sincere - 2
  2. long - 1
  3. very - 1
  4. probably - 1
  5. pressingly - 1

Sentences sentiment

Most positive
  1. We ended it after more than two hours.0.5
  2. Instead, what you’re about to see seemed, to us, sincere, whether you agree with it or not.0.5
  3. The interview, as you will see if you watch it, is primarily about the war in progress, the war in Ukraine, how it started, what’s happening, and most pressingly, how it might end.0.45
  4. But we concluded in the end, for what it’s worth, that it was not a filibustering technique.0.3
  5. At the beginning of the interview, we asked the most obvious question, which is, why did you do this?0.25
Most negative
  1. And the answer we got shocked us.-0.7
  2. The following is an interview with the president of Russia Vladimir Putin, shot February 6th, 2024 at about 19:00 P.M. in the building behind us, which is of course the Kremlin.-0.2
  3. Putin went on for a very long time, probably half an hour, about the history of Russia going back to the 8th century, and honestly, we thought this was a filibustering technique and found it annoying and interrupted him several times and he responded, he was annoyed by the interruption.-0.12
  4. How did you conclude that?0.0
  5. Tell us why you believe the United States might strike Russia out of the blue.0.0
Most objective
  1. And the answer we got shocked us.0.8
  2. The interview, as you will see if you watch it, is primarily about the war in progress, the war in Ukraine, how it started, what’s happening, and most pressingly, how it might end.0.5
  3. At the beginning of the interview, we asked the most obvious question, which is, why did you do this?0.5
  4. We ended it after more than two hours.0.5
  5. Instead, what you’re about to see seemed, to us, sincere, whether you agree with it or not.0.5
Most subjective
  1. How did you conclude that?0.0
  2. And to American ears, that sounds paranoid.0.0
  3. On February 22nd, 2022, you addressed your country in a nationwide address when the conflict in Ukraine started, and you said that you were acting because you had come to the conclusion that the United States, through NATO, might initiate a 'surprise attack on our country”.0.0
  4. Mr. President, thank you.0.0
  5. And with that, here it is.0.0

Contact Form

Please contact if want to see certain debate of speech analyzed or have any other questions

Submit